Cái thằng viết bài ở trên bảo đảm ăn tiền của hãng phim 12 nên mới cố tình nâng ball 12 dìm hàng các phim khác dã man như vậy.phim nào mà ko hư cấu ,phim ko hư cấu chỉ có phim tài liệu.Mấy chi tiết khác thực tế này của 12 sao ko thấy nó nói gì nhỉ
Noah Berlatsky wrote in the The Atlantic about a scene in McQueen's movie version, shortly after Northup is kidnapped, when he is on a ship bound south, when a sailor who has entered the hold is about to rape a slave woman when a male slave intervenes. "The sailor unhesitatingly stabs and kills him," he wrote, and "this seems unlikely on its face—slaves are valuable, and the sailor is not the owner. And, sure enough, the scene is not in the book."[36]
Forrest Wickman of Slate wrote of Northup's book giving a more favorable account of the author's onetime master, William Ford, than the McQueen film. In Northup's own words, "There never was a more kind, noble, candid, Christian man than William Ford," adding that Ford's circumstances "blinded [Ford] to the inherent wrong at the bottom of the system of Slavery." The movie, however, according to Wickham, "frequently undermines Ford."[37] McQueen also undercuts Christianity itself as well, in an effort to update the ethical lessons from Northup's story for the 21st century, by holding the institutions of Christianity up to the light for their ability to justify slavery at the time.[38] Northup was a Christian of his time, writing of his former master being "blinded" by "circumstances"[37] that in retrospect meant a racist acceptance of slavery despite being a Christian, a position untenable to contemporary Christians[39] and to Christian abolitionists of the 19th century but not contradictory to Northup himself. Valerie Elverton Dixon in the Washington Post characterized the Christianity depicted in the movie as "broken"[38], although Christian religion was one of the causes behind abolitionism.